What's In This Page? Show

In the complex landscape of the legal world, DUI charges hold a unique place due to the diverse factors that play a role in their application and dismissal. Driving Under the Influence (DUI) cases in California are both numerous and varied, often involving a wide range of different circumstances, contexts, and legal considerations. This article seeks to demystify the process of how DUI charges can be dropped in California, providing comprehensive insight into the legal journey from the initial arrest to potential dismissal of charges.

A Glance at DUI Charges in California

In California, a person can be charged with a DUI if they are found operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or a combination of both. For adults aged 21 and over, a Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or more can lead to DUI charges. Meanwhile, those under 21 are subject to the state’s Zero Tolerance Law, which means any detectable level of alcohol can result in charges. DUI laws also apply to the influence of drugs, whether they’re illicit substances, prescription medications, or over-the-counter remedies.

The Importance of Understanding the Legal Process

For anyone facing DUI charges, understanding the legal process is crucial. This knowledge can influence not only the outcome of a case, but also the accused person’s ability to navigate through the complex legal system. Familiarity with DUI laws and legal procedures can potentially open avenues for challenging the validity of the charges, setting the stage for the possibility of dismissal.

The Initial Arrest and Charges

Overview of DUI Arrest Procedures in California

An encounter with DUI begins with a traffic stop, usually initiated by an officer who has observed what they believe to be signs of impaired driving. These could be erratic movement, speeding, failure to adhere to traffic laws, or involvement in an accident. Once stopped, the officer will look for further signs of impairment, such as the smell of alcohol, slurred speech, or bloodshot eyes.

If the officer suspects impairment, field sobriety tests (FSTs) may be conducted. These tests can include the horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN) test, the walk-and-turn test, and the one-leg stand test. If the driver fails these tests, or if they refuse to take them, they may be asked to provide a breath sample for a preliminary alcohol screening (PAS) test using a handheld device known as a breathalyzer. The officer may also arrest the driver based on observed impairment and transport them to a police station or hospital for a more accurate blood or breath test.

Common Types of DUI Charges in the State

California law defines several types of DUI charges, the most common of which are:

Vehicle Code 23152(a): Driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
Vehicle Code 23152(b): Driving with a BAC of 0.08% or higher.
Vehicle Code 23152(e): Driving under the influence of drugs.
Vehicle Code 23152(f): Driving under the combined influence of alcohol and drugs.

Additionally, enhanced penalties can be levied for cases involving high BAC levels (0.15% or higher), refusal to submit to chemical testing, causing injury or death to another person while DUI, or having previous DUI convictions.

Factors That May Lead to DUI Charges Being Dropped

Lack of Probable Cause for the Traffic Stop

One of the most common factors leading to DUI charges being dropped involves the initial traffic stop. Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, an officer must have probable cause to make a traffic stop. If an officer pulled you over without valid reason, any evidence gathered during the subsequent DUI investigation may be deemed inadmissible, potentially leading to dismissal of the charges.

Issues with Field Sobriety Tests and Breathalyzer Accuracy

FSTs and breathalyzer tests have come under scrutiny for potential inaccuracies and biases. If your attorney can prove that the tests were administered incorrectly, that environmental factors affected the results, or that the officer lacked proper training, the test results may be thrown out. Similarly, breathalyzers must be maintained and calibrated according to strict guidelines. If there are records of poor maintenance or calibration, the accuracy of the results can be disputed.

Challenging the Validity of Blood Tests and Evidence Collection

Evidence collection is critical in a DUI case. However, if it’s done incorrectly, it can lead to the dismissal of charges. Your attorney can challenge the way your blood was drawn, stored, and analyzed. Any break in the chain of custody or errors in lab analysis can lead to the blood test results being deemed inadmissible.

Mistakes in Police Reports and Administrative Errors

A police officer’s report plays a significant role in a DUI case. However, mistakes happen. If the police report contains factual inaccuracies, inconsistent information, or omits critical details, these errors can be used to challenge the prosecution’s case.

Violation of Miranda Rights or Due Process

If your Miranda rights weren’t read to you upon arrest, or if you were denied your right to an attorney during questioning, it could form a valid defense. Similarly, if there were violations of due process, such as unnecessary delays in bringing charges or trying your case, it could result in the dismissal of the charges.

The Role of a DUI Attorney

Why Legal Representation Is Crucial

Navigating the complexities of a DUI case is not a journey one should undertake alone. The aid of a DUI attorney is critical for several reasons. They have a profound understanding of the law, can negotiate with the prosecution, and can explore ways to get charges reduced or dismissed. An attorney can identify procedural errors, challenge the evidence’s validity, and ensure your rights are fully protected. They’re essential in bringing objectivity and a sound defense strategy to a situation that can often be emotionally charged and stressful.

How a DUI Attorney Evaluates a Case for Potential Dismissal

A DUI attorney starts by scrutinizing every detail of your case, from the initial traffic stop to the final arrest. They’ll review the police report for inconsistencies and errors, investigate the proper administration of field sobriety tests and breathalyzer tests, and verify whether the officer had valid probable cause for the traffic stop.

They will also scrutinize blood test procedures, ensure correct handling and storage of samples, and check if the chain of custody was maintained. Any violations of your constitutional rights will be noted and used in your defense. If there’s room for reasonable doubt or if there were legal or procedural errors, your attorney can file motions to have evidence suppressed or charges dismissed.

Building a Strong Defense to Challenge DUI Charges

Building a robust defense in a DUI case involves a comprehensive strategy. This could include bringing in expert witnesses to testify about the reliability of breathalyzer tests, the effects of certain medical conditions on BAC levels, or how a specific drug might influence your driving ability. A solid defense also requires thoroughly cross-examining the prosecution’s witnesses, challenging their testimony, and discrediting their evidence.

Pre-Trial Motions and Negotiations

Filing Motions to Suppress Evidence

One key tactic used by DUI attorneys is filing pre-trial motions, such as motions to suppress evidence. If evidence was obtained through an illegal traffic stop, faulty sobriety test, or violation of your rights, a motion to suppress can be filed to prevent this evidence from being used against you. If the motion is granted, the prosecution’s case can be significantly weakened, sometimes to the point where they have no choice but to drop the charges.

Seeking Reduction of Charges through Plea Bargaining

Plea bargaining is another pre-trial strategy where your attorney negotiates with the prosecution to reduce your charges or minimize the penalties. This typically involves pleading guilty to a lesser charge, such as a “wet reckless” (reckless driving involving alcohol) instead of a DUI. Plea bargains can be beneficial if there’s a strong case against you, but they require careful consideration and legal advice.

Exploring Diversion Programs and Alternative Sentencing

In some cases, especially for first-time offenders, your attorney might negotiate for alternative sentencing or diversion programs. These can include alcohol education programs, community service, probation, or treatment programs. Completion of such programs can sometimes lead to dismissal of the charges.

The Court Process and Trial Preparation

Arraignment and Entering a Plea

The arraignment is your first court appearance. During this session, you are formally read the charges against you, and you have an opportunity to enter a plea. The plea could be “guilty,” “not guilty,” or “no contest”. A plea of “not guilty” will lead to a trial, while a “guilty” or “no contest” plea would typically bypass the trial and move directly to sentencing. This is a critical stage and it’s important to have legal representation to guide you in entering the most beneficial plea based on the evidence.

Discovery and Gathering Evidence

Discovery is a pre-trial process where both the defense and prosecution share the evidence they plan to use during the trial. This exchange can lead to a deeper understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of both sides, potentially informing plea deals or other legal strategies. The defense will gather and examine all available evidence, including police reports, breathalyzer calibration records, video footage, and witness statements, to develop the strongest possible defense.

Preparing Witnesses and Expert Testimony

The preparation of witnesses and expert testimonies is a crucial part of trial preparation. Witnesses can include anyone who has firsthand knowledge about the case, such as those present at the time of the arrest. Expert witnesses, such as toxicologists or forensic analysts, can provide testimony about technical aspects of the case, including the effects of certain substances on the body or the accuracy of testing methods. The goal is to establish reasonable doubt about the prosecution’s case or validate the defense’s claims.

Special Circumstances That May Lead to Dismissal

Medical Conditions and Medications Affecting Test Results

Certain medical conditions and medications can affect the results of breathalyzer tests and cause falsely high BAC readings. Conditions like diabetes, GERD, or hypoglycemia, and medications containing alcohol could potentially lead to incorrect results. If such conditions can be verified through medical records and expert testimony, these can provide a basis for contesting the DUI charges and possibly getting them dismissed.

Involuntary Intoxication or Spiked Drinks

Involuntary intoxication refers to scenarios where a person becomes intoxicated without their knowledge or against their will, such as having a drink spiked. If it can be proven that you were unknowingly drugged, it might be possible to use this defense to have the charges dropped. However, this can be challenging to prove and often requires corroborative evidence.

Demonstrating a Lack of Driving Impairment

The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that your driving was impaired due to intoxication. If you can demonstrate that your driving was not actually impaired despite a high BAC reading, it may form a defense. For example, dashcam footage showing normal driving behavior, despite a failed breathalyzer test, could create doubt about whether the test results were accurate or relevant.

The Possibility of Civil Compromises

Civil Compromise as a Way to Resolve DUI Cases

In certain situations, a civil compromise may be a potential way to resolve DUI cases, especially those involving accidents or property damage. Essentially, this is an agreement between the accused person and the victim where the accused compensates the victim for their losses, and in return, the victim asks the court to dismiss the criminal case. It’s important to note that civil compromises are generally more common in cases involving misdemeanor charges, and they may not be applicable to DUI cases depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances of the case.

Factors Considered by the Court in Civil Compromise Requests

Courts do not automatically approve civil compromises. They consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the extent of the damage or injury caused, the accused’s criminal history, and whether the victim is genuinely satisfied with the compromise. If the court finds that justice would be served by the agreement, they may decide to dismiss the charges.

The Impact of Legal Defenses on DUI Charges

Suppression of Evidence Due to Unlawful Search and Seizure

Under the Fourth Amendment, you are protected from unlawful searches and seizures. This means that law enforcement must have a valid reason to stop your vehicle, conduct a search, or seize evidence like breath or blood samples. If this right is violated, the evidence obtained can be suppressed, severely weakening the prosecution’s case and possibly leading to the charges being dropped.

Challenging Field Sobriety Test Accuracy and Officer Training

The accuracy of field sobriety tests is often a point of contention in DUI cases. Many factors can affect the reliability of these tests, including the subject’s physical condition, environmental factors, and the manner in which the tests were conducted. If it can be proven that the tests were improperly administered or the officer was inadequately trained, the results of these tests might be invalidated.

Contending Breathalyzer Calibration and Maintenance Issues

Breathalyzers need to be properly calibrated and maintained to provide accurate results. The prosecution must prove that the device used was in good working condition and correctly calibrated at the time of the test. If your attorney can establish that the device was malfunctioning or improperly calibrated, the test results can be contested.

Contesting Blood Test Chain of Custody and Lab Analysis

The chain of custody for blood test samples is vital to their admissibility in court. If there’s any break in the chain or doubt about the handling, storage, or analysis of the sample, the results can be challenged. Moreover, lab analyses are not infallible and can be contested, particularly if there were irregularities in the process or the lab has a history of errors.

Successful Case Outcomes: DUI Charges Dismissed

The ultimate goal in any DUI case is to have the charges reduced or dismissed. This could occur due to various reasons, as discussed above, such as lack of probable cause for the traffic stop, inaccuracies in sobriety tests, violation of constitutional rights, or through successful plea bargaining.

Case Examples of DUI Charges Dropped in California

Consider a scenario where a driver was pulled over due to a broken tail light, and the officer then conducted a DUI investigation despite not having observed any signs of impairment. In such a case, the traffic stop could be argued to lack probable cause for a DUI investigation, and any evidence gathered could be suppressed, potentially leading to dismissal of the charges.

In another case, the driver might have a medical condition such as GERD, which can cause mouth alcohol contamination and falsely high BAC readings on breathalyzer tests. If this condition could be proven with medical records and expert testimony, it could result in the breath test results being dismissed, and possibly the DUI charges as well.

Every DUI case is unique, with its own set of facts and circumstances, and these examples are only illustrative of how a DUI case might unfold.

In conclusion, while DUI charges in California are serious, they are not always insurmountable. A variety of factors can lead to charges being dropped or reduced, and a skilled DUI attorney is invaluable in identifying these factors and building a strong defense on your behalf. Understanding the legal process and potential defenses is the first step towards successfully navigating a DUI case.

Famous DUI Charges Dropped Cases in California

California has seen several high-profile DUI cases where the charges were ultimately dismissed or reduced. These cases serve as examples of the various factors that can influence the outcome of a DUI case, from the particulars of the evidence to the effectiveness of the defense strategy. Below are some notable examples:

1. Case of John Stamos

John Stamos, a famous actor known for his role in “Full House,” was arrested on suspicion of DUI in Beverly Hills in June 2015. Initially, he was charged with driving under the influence of drugs. However, his legal team presented a strong defense, arguing that the police tests failed to prove that Stamos was impaired at the time of his arrest. Subsequently, Stamos pleaded no contest to a lesser charge of misdemeanor driving while under the influence of a drug. As a result, he avoided jail time, was given probation, and was required to attend a drug diversion program.

2. Case of Stephanie Pratt

In October 2009, Stephanie Pratt, star of the reality television series “The Hills,” was arrested on suspicion of drunk driving in Hollywood. The case drew significant public attention. However, the DUI charges against Pratt were dropped when her attorney negotiated a plea deal. She pleaded no contest to a lesser charge of “exhibition of speed” and was sentenced to three years of informal probation and ordered to complete a 12-week alcohol education program.

3. Case of Haley Joel Osment

Haley Joel Osment, known for his role in “The Sixth Sense,” was involved in a DUI and marijuana possession case in 2006. The incident included a car crash, but despite the serious circumstances, the charges were not as severe as they could have been. His attorney was able to negotiate a plea deal, and Osment pleaded no contest to misdemeanor DUI and drug possession charges. As a result, he avoided jail time but was placed on three years’ probation, fined, and mandated to attend alcohol education programs.

4. Case of Lamar Odom

Former NBA player Lamar Odom was arrested for DUI in August 2013 after he was observed driving erratically. His case is noteworthy because he refused to submit to chemical tests at the time of his arrest, which resulted in an automatic one-year suspension of his driving privileges. However, the prosecution agreed to drop the DUI charge in exchange for a plea of no contest to reckless driving. Odom was placed on probation and ordered to attend a three-month alcohol education program.

5. Case of Chris Klein

Chris Klein, an actor best known for his role in the “American Pie” series, was arrested on suspicion of DUI in 2010 after his vehicle was spotted weaving across lanes on a freeway in Los Angeles. However, the prosecution’s case faced challenges when Klein’s attorney raised questions about the accuracy of the breathalyzer test results. This, combined with Klein’s immediate commitment to a long-term rehabilitation program, resulted in the charges being reduced to a “wet reckless” charge, a lesser offense. Klein was sentenced to four years of probation and required to complete an 18-month alcohol education program.

6. Case of Khloé Kardashian

Reality television star Khloé Kardashian was arrested for DUI in 2007. Her high-profile case received wide media attention. Kardashian faced a potential jail sentence, but her attorney was able to negotiate a plea deal. She pleaded no contest to the DUI charges, resulting in a sentence that included three years of probation and required completion of an alcohol education program, but avoided jail time.

7. Case of Paris Hilton

Paris Hilton, a socialite and reality television star, was pulled over and arrested for DUI in September 2006 in Hollywood. She was initially charged with DUI, but her legal team was able to negotiate a plea deal. Hilton pleaded no contest to a lesser charge of reckless driving. As a result, she was placed on 36 months of probation, fined, and ordered to attend an alcohol education program.

8. Case of Mike Tyson

Famous boxer Mike Tyson was arrested for DUI and drug possession in Arizona in 2006, a case that made national headlines. Despite facing potential felony charges, Tyson’s attorney was able to negotiate a plea deal that reduced the charges to misdemeanors. Tyson pleaded guilty to the charges and received a sentence of 24 hours in jail, three years of probation, and 360 hours of community service.

These cases, like those discussed earlier, showcase the range of outcomes possible in DUI cases and underline the importance of effective legal representation. It’s critical to remember, though, that each case is distinct, and these outcomes depend heavily on the specific circumstances and evidence presented. A successful defense or negotiation in one case does not guarantee the same result in another. Legal representation experienced in DUI law is crucial in navigating these complex issues and working toward the most favorable outcome.